The Role of the Scientific Community in the War Crimes of Their States: A Critical Bibliography of Walter Christaller
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66659/qta4cs82Keywords:
Walter Christaller; central place theory; scientific responsibility; applied geog-raphy; spatial planning; Third Reich; Generalplan Ost; technocratic expertise; occupation regimes; totalitarianism; ethics of science; political geography; his-tory of geography; contemporary Russia; war and knowledge.Abstract
This paper analyzes the role of scientific expertise in the operation of aggressive and totalitarian state systems, focusing on a critical examination of Walter Christaller and the scientific community within the Third Reich. The analysis establishes a structural comparison between the historical case of Nazi Germany and the current state of Russian academic geography, especially regarding Russia's ongoing military actions in Ukraine. The stance of impartiality maintained by specialists operating in authoritarian systems facilitates the conversion of scientific knowledge into a functional element of state violence. The paper demonstrates that the persistent reliance on secondary interpretations and schematic representations obscures the direct historical linkage between theory and its practical implementation under conditions of occupation and coercion. The bibliography is therefore treated not merely as a reference tool, but as a critical analytical instrument that exposes the continuity between technocratic planning, ideological alignment, and ethical responsibility.
References
1. Fernández de Betoño U. The Nazi anti-urban utopia: “Generalplan Ost”. Mètode Rev Difus Investig. 2020:165–171. doi:10.7203/metode.10.13009
2. Barnes TJ. “Desk killers”: Walter Christaller, central place theory, and the Nazis. In: Meusburger P, Gregory D, Suarsana L, editors. Geographies of knowledge and power. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 187–201.
3. Kay AJ. Exploitation, resettlement, mass murder: political and economic planning for German occupation policy in the Soviet Union, 1940–1941. New York: Berghahn; 2006. 256 p.
4. Rössler M. Applied geography and area research in Nazi society: central place theory and planning, 1933–1945. In: Giaccaria P, Minca C, editors. Hitler’s geographies: the spatialities of the Third Reich. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2016. p. 182–197.
5. Shuper VA. The principle of complementarity and central place theory. Izv Ross Akad Nauk Ser Geogr. 1996;(4):88–94. (In Russian).
6. Shuper VA. Self-organization of urban settlement systems. Moscow: Russian Open University; 1995. 168 p. (In Russian).
7. Vazhenin AA. Evolutionary processes in settlement systems. Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 1997. 62 p. (In Russian).
8. Dmitriev RV. On the constancy of the central place population share within its ser-vice area across all levels of Christaller’s hierarchy. Izv Ross Akad Nauk Ser Geogr. 2019; (1):128–135. doi:10.31857/S2587-556620191128-135 (In Russian).
9. Dmitriev RV. Spatial metrics in central place theory: old problems, new solutions. Geogr Vestn. 2019;2(49):24–34. doi:10.17072/2079-7877-2019-2-24-34. (In Rus-sian).
10. Dmitriev RV. Evolutionary processes in central place systems. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Geographical Sciences (Doctor Habilitatus). Moscow: Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences; 2022. 223 p. (In Russian).
11. Dmitriev RV, Gorokhov SA. Central place systems: continuous development at early stages. Spatial Economics. 2022;18(2):38–55. (In Russian). doi:10.14530/se.2022.2.038-055
12. Dmitriev RV, Shuper VA. Axiomatic foundation of central place theory: revision from the perspective of the Russian scientific school. Izv Ross Akad Nauk Ser Geogr. 2023;87 (3):339–347. doi:10.31857/S2587556623030068 (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.