Fiber-Optic Drone Tether Debris (FODTD) as an Emerging Form of War-Related Environmental Contamination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66659/swfqsz58Keywords:
fiber-optic drone tether debris; post-conflict contamination; war-related pol-lution; soil contamination; filamentous plastics; microfibers; war ecologyAbstract
Contemporary armed conflicts increasingly rely on fiber-optic-guided unmanned aerial systems (UAS) as a technological response to electronic warfare. While the military effectiveness of these systems has been widely discussed, their environmental consequences have received little attention. One material by-product of this shift is the large-scale accumulation of fiber-optic drone tether debris (FODTD): polymer-coated optical fiber remnants dispersed across soils, vegetation, and surface environments in conflict zones. We propose that FODTD constitutes a distinct and previously unrecognized form of post-conflict environmental contamination. Unlike conventional military debris or generalized plastic pollution, FODTD is characterized by filamentous physical structure, high spatial dispersion, persistence in terrestrial environments, and predominantly physical modes of environmental interaction rather than acute chemical toxicity. Through abrasion, weathering, and mechanical fragmentation, FODTD can generate war-derived polymer microfibers (WDPM), linking visible tether remnants to long-term micro-scale transformations in soils and surface layers. Drawing on analogies with fishing gear debris, agricultural plastics, and other filamentous anthropogenic materials, we outline plausible environmental impact pathways and identify critical knowledge gaps. Ukraine, where fiber-optic-guided drones have been deployed intensively over multiple years, represents a first large-scale real-world setting in which this emerging form of contamination can be observed at an early stage. Recognizing FODTD as a discrete environmental object is essential for post-war land recovery, environmental monitoring, and anticipating the ecological legacies of drone-based warfare.
References
1. Goncharova T. The Long Shadow of Wartime Chemical Pollution: Reflections on the Vietnam War and Contemporary Conflicts. Pollution and Diseases. 2025;1(January):70–78. http://doi.org/10.66659/pd.2025.003
2. Nikolaenko D. Pollution, Disease, and the Escalating Freshwater Crisis: An Integrat-ed Review of the Mississippi and Missouri River Studies by K.R. Olson. Pollution and Diseases. 2026;2(January):5–11. http://doi.org/10.66659/pd.2026.001
3. Morton LW. Transformation of Soil and Water Properties in Agricultural Lands by Military Activity: Perspectives and Guiding Principles for the Reconstruction of War-Ravaged Agricultural Lands and Waters. Pollution and Diseases. 2026;2(April):43–64. http://doi.org/10.66659/pd.2026.004
4. Nikolaenko D. War and Peace: The Production of Human Environments. Pollution and Diseases. 2026;2(January):12–39. http://doi.org/10.66659/pd.2026.002
5. Kuntner M, Coddington JA. Discovery of the Largest Orbweaving Spider Species: The Evolution of Gigantism in Nephila. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7516. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007516
6. Agnarsson I, Kuntner M, Blackledge TA. Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):e11234. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011234
7. Gregorič M, Agnarsson I, Blackledge TA, Kuntner M. How did the spider cross the river? Behavioral adaptations for river-bridging webs in Caerostris darwini (Araneae: Araneidae). PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26847 http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026847
8. Yip EC, Powers KS, Avilés L. Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling chal-lenge faced by spider societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(33):11818–11822. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710603105
9. Avilés L, Tufiño P. Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. The American Naturalist. 1998;152(3):403–418. http://doi.org/10.1086/286178
10. Do H-L, Armstrong CW. Ghost fishing gear and their effect on ecosystem services—Identification and knowledge gaps. Marine Policy. 2023;150:105528. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105528
11. Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, Buchmann C, David J, Tröger J, Muñoz K, Frör O, Schaumann GE. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agro-nomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of the Total Environment. 2016;550:690–705. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153
12. Rillig MC, Lehmann A, de Souza Machado AA, Yang G. Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytologist. 2019;223(3):1066–1070. http://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15794
13. Andrady AL, Barnes PW, Bornman JF, Gouin T, Madronich S, White CC, Zepp RG, Jansen MAK. Oxidation and fragmentation of plastics in a changing environment: from UV-radiation to biological degradation. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;851:158022. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158022
14. Janani R, Majumder D, Scrimshire A, Stone A, Wakelin E, Jones AH, Wheeler NV, Brooks W, Bingham PA. From acrylates to silicones: a review of common optical fibre coatings used for normal to harsh environments. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2023;180:107557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107557
15. Zhong X, Qiang L, Cheng J, Sun Z, Hu H, Liu H, Zhang R. Aging or degradation? Transformation mechanisms of microplastics in soil environments. Applied Soil Ecology. 2025;215:106394. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106394
16. Garcia J, di Luca C, Lopez L, de Pedro ZM, Casas JA, Muñoz M. Removal of textile microplastic fibers from water by photo-Fenton oxidation. Water Research. 2026;289:124999. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124999
17. Novotna J, Tunak M, Militky J, et al. Release of microplastic fibers from polyester knit fleece during abrasion, washing, and drying. ACS Omega. 2025;10(14):14241–14249. http://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00258
18. Auyang E, Ouyang M, Laycock A, et al. Fabrication of microplastic and nanoplastic particles and fibres for use in pulmonary toxicity studies. Particle and Fibre Toxicol-ogy. 2025;22:30. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-025-00641-w
19. Khaleel R, Valsan G, Rangel-Buitrago N, Warrier AK. Microplastics in the marine environment of St. Mary’s Island: implications for human health and conservation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2023;195(9):1034. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11651-6
20. Ramos-Vázquez MA, Verma SK, Armstrong-Altrin JS, et al. Characterization of mi-croplastics in marine sediments from the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexican Pacific. Car-pathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2024;19(2):255–264. http://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2024/019/296
21. Sarkar S, Diab H, Thompson J. Microplastic pollution: chemical characterization and impact on wildlife. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(3):1745. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031745
22. Kaegi R, Philipp M, Jüngling IS, et al. Quantification of small (1–10 µm) microplastic particles in soil matrices using automated scanning electron microscopy: possibilities and limitations. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2025;417(27):6191–6208. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-06111-8
23. Hossain MI, Zhang Y, Haque ANMA, et al. Fibrous microplastics release from textile production phases: a brief review of current challenges and applied research direc-tions. Materials. 2025;18(11):2513. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112513
24. Certini G, Scalenghe R. Anthropogenic soils are the golden spikes for the Anthropo-cene. The Holocene. 2011;21(8):1269–1274. http://doi.org/10.1177/0959683611408454
25. Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R. Ac-cumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ-mental Science & Technology. 2011;45(21):9175–9179. http://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s
26. Rochman CM, Hoh E, Hentschel BT, Kaye S. Long-term field measurement of sorp-tion of organic contaminants to five types of plastic pellets: implications for plastic marine debris. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013;47(3):1646–1654. http://doi.org/10.1021/es303700s
27. de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Till J, et al. Impacts of microplastics on the soil bio-physical environment. Environmental Science & Technology. 2018;52(17):9656–9665. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02212
28. de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Kloas W, et al. Microplastics can change soil proper-ties and affect plant performance. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019;53(10):6044–6052. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01339
29. Tourinho PS, Kočí V, Loureiro S, van Gestel CAM. Partitioning of chemical contami-nants to microplastics: sorption mechanisms, environmental distribution and effects on toxicity and bioaccumulation. Environmental Pollution. 2019;252(Pt B):1246–1256. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.030
30. Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. Life in the plastisphere: microbial com-munities on plastic marine debris. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013;47(13):7137–7146. http://doi.org/10.1021/es401288x
31. Rillig MC, Ingraffia R, de Souza Machado AA. Microplastic incorporation into soil in agroecosystems. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1805. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01805
32. MacLean J, Mayanna S, Benning LG, Horn F, Bartholomäus A, Wiesner Y, Wagner D, Liebner S. The terrestrial plastisphere: diversity and polymer-colonizing potential of plastic-associated microbial communities in soil. Microorganisms. 2021;9(9):1876. http://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091876
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study.